Updated 31 October 2026

Our approach

The aim is to make this website readable and usable by people with different abilities and ways of accessing the web. WCAG 2.2 Level AA is the technical target for improvements. This page describes the current approach and known limits; it is not a claim of independently certified or complete conformance.

Using the site

  • Use Tab to move between links and controls. The first link skips directly to the main content.
  • At narrow screen widths, Menu opens the navigation. Enter or Space operates the button. Escape closes the menu and returns focus to it.
  • Use your browser's zoom and text-size controls. Pages are designed to reflow on small screens.
  • Headings, navigation landmarks, descriptive links and image descriptions support assistive technology. A text equivalent accompanies the code in the homepage illustration.
  • Source-reading disclosures can be opened with Enter or Space. They provide HTML alternatives or document notes where available.
  • The design includes visible keyboard focus and respects reduced-motion preferences.

Checks and improvements

The review on 31 October 2026 covered the site's public pages, keyboard navigation, accessibility-tree structure, responsive layouts and linked publication documents. Improvements include clearer PDF labels, explicit row-header associations in publication tables, source-reading alternatives and document-specific access notes.

These checks do not establish how every page is announced by every screen reader. Full testing with screen-reader users remains outstanding, and new writing and site changes need continuing review.

Known document limits

The linked publications and source documents are hosted by other organisations. Checks found PDFs without document tags, some English documents with incorrect or missing language metadata, and scanned pages with little or no extractable text. Document structure and reading order could be reviewed for the files retrieved, with visual checks on representative pages; this was not a complete PDF/UA certification or a page-by-page listening test.

  • The Big Tech article includes an expandable list of official HTML reading options. Case summaries and document lists are identified as such; they are not full-text replacements for orders.
  • The archived consequential-loss guide has screen-reader limitations. Its record distinguishes the original contribution from the publisher's newer online edition.
  • Some external document services restrict automated access or require a particular PDF viewer. Retrieval failures were not treated as evidence that a document passes or fails accessibility checks.

I cannot alter files hosted by other publishers. The available HTML descriptions, alternative source links and assistance route reduce barriers, but they do not repair every external document.

Request help or report a problem

Email malek.takieddine@al-jad.com with the page or document address, the problem and the format or assistance that would help. If useful, include your browser or assistive technology. You do not need to provide medical information.

I will review the issue and discuss a workable way to access the material, such as a readable text version where available and permitted. You can request help even if the issue is not listed above.